I understand your points. I don't really have an argument against it (or fishsupreme's below.
There just seems like there's a problem with the proceeds of millions or billions of transactions, happening all around the world, being focused through the corporation, and through the hands of a very few top decisionmakers, into influencing "free" elections.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-05-02 08:02 pm (UTC)There just seems like there's a problem with the proceeds of millions or billions of transactions, happening all around the world, being focused through the corporation, and through the hands of a very few top decisionmakers, into influencing "free" elections.
It's a frustrating issue.